Who created the world we mean to know. Either it was the big bang for the science or hashem for the religion or both. However, who wrote the small print where we can read that the human should destroy themself, or supress or rush or be lucky.
Sometimes it seems as if the constitution doesn´t work what it should work. Because to let move the human in his individual developement where he mean to be able to move.Only preventing by his wants and then make accused that he doesn´t want not more and then to push him where he doesn´t want not more. The constitution makes possible liberality, that means to move to a place or to live where poeple mean that it is right for himself, if it is possible. If poeple has the impression that it is possible, he should has to do this so to live, that he means to become lucky.
But who wrote the small print? Know-it-all poeple or smallcross-hatched people? Is that the reality? Or is the true so that it was written from the life itself, from that life where is our source and we create how we can live in it?
Poeple are speaking of rights, of toleranze, that thinking where we all humankinds. But, if we meet the point where we want to realize this, the idea of toleranze differs very much. To determine about someone as poeple think it is better, to push directions and the individuals as poeple think it is o.k., is a dictatur and a removal of freedom also a removal to be lucky. To create a game with rules and to assume that the other plays the same game and to accept the rules, can be endlessly, if poeple doesn´t notice, to play suddenly alone without the others.
To choose a religion and to go with this teaches is natural and legitim, not legitim is to prevent that decision or even to destroy it. To go with a religion, to practise it, nevertheless to work is even desirably. Religion is good as far it doesn´t meet the criminality and does not destroy the own personality.
On its effects it is decided when the individual or others are destroyed. Will it, however, be destroyed by others only because it has decided to live in this kind straight because it do not destroy the life, the criminality is a source of the others and radicality is a understood of the others.
Calltec
calltec on the blog
Beth Shalom ,not only brown and blue
The color of water
Montag, 10. September 2007
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen